A Few Unpolitically Correct Insights

The first insight is into what makes for a Schwazzenegaresque work of art. Is it simply being one step removed from Hitleresque as I suspect it to be? Well, Arnie played a robot who goes around collectively punishing all of his enemies (which just happen to be all humanity) and following its programming like a Necron. How much more fascistic can you get than a necron? How much more neurotic and anal retentive can you get than being a machine that follows its programming? The evidence seems conclusive does it not?

Ahh, but maybe the fact Schwazzenegar became a member of the Hitlerite Republican Party has nothing to do with his audience's perception of his work! And what about Conan the Barbarian? Doesn't that sound sufficiently psychopathic? And psychopaths are the opposites of right-wing authoritarians, just as the Joker is Batman's opposite. BUT, observe this cutting analysis which shows how far Conan is from being a loose cannon, he is a momma's boy forever tied to her apron strings. He only acts like a psychopath becasue he comes from a psychopathic (ie, barbarian) society.

The second insight is the fact that 'noble' is an intrinsic thus anarchistic quality. Now, this may seem bizarre, but where's the fun mathematically proving it to be true? People don't listen and people don't give a shit about anything important or new or novel, at least as far as a creative genius defines novel, so let's skip all that tedious math and get to the fun part: following the implications of an "insane" axiom to their logical conclusion until someone's puny brittle mind shatters.

The first implication has to do with Putin being noble. We know that Putin is noble because he is Tarzan and Tarzan is a noble savage whose nobility is undisputed and unchallengeable fact. Putin and Tarzan are not right-wing authoritarians or fascists, they are manly Moralists who care for the little people and enforce standards. We know Putin is a moralist because he is honest and straightforward, unlike all the dishonest lickspittle Euro politicians, he told journalists that Africans shouldn't be celebrated because they are cannibals. And he said it because it's true.

Secondly, what makes them noble is the fact they themselves have to break the standards they were raised by and that surround them in order to act BETTER than everyone else. Tarzan is noble because he behaves better than an animal (ie, a noble savage is not a savage) and Putin is better because he doesn't behave like a Russian or a KGB man or a mafia boss. Russia's standards might be low but few Russians have the testicles to rise above them. Putin is the man with the balls to be better than his contemporaries and to lead them into a bright shining future. Even if he has to break a few skulls to do it. Napoleon did it, Alexander did it, and now Putin is doing it.

Thirdly, if nobility is an intrinsic thus anarchistic qualitty then why is it that right-wing authoritarians value it so much? Well, it's because right-wing authoritarians are all coprophiliacs eating the food their mummy preprocessed for them from her ass. They are traditionalists who assimilate all of the values and traditions of the precvious generations. And in order to climb the ladder, their ancestors had to break more than a few rules because reality simply doesn't work the way Necrons' ossified brains want to believe. So they, being born to privilege are intrinsically better than their non-coprophilic ancestors. That is why RWAs believe they have the intrinsic quality of nobility which their ancestors (who were ennobled and entitled) lacked. In fact, it's precisely the reason why you have to be born to the upper class and can't simply climb up to it to be really noble as far as the upper classes and RWAs are concerned.

The third insight has to do with what each gender wants. Now, a lot of people regurgitate the idiocy that women desire power. But if this were strictly and logically true then women would do the things that are necessary to acquire power. Things like going out on explorer starships called Enterprise um Spanish Galleons called the Santa Maria in order to explore strange new continents and seek new slaves. But women have never done any of those things, EVER, in all of human history, and they have stayed the fuck away from political power too. Why? Because women are highly risk averse.

Now, when people really want something then they're willing to take risks to get it. 1% chance of winning 100 million dollars? Are you kidding? I'm in! When the reward is HIGH enough then even a low chance of success seems amazing. But apparently, the reward of Power is NEVER high enough to get women to move their asses. Blatantly evident to anyone with a mind, women don't want power and have never wanted it. Yet equally, there is SOMETHING about power which they DO want, otherwise it wouldn't turn them on so damned much.

What do women want? They want to be indulged like the emotionally underdeveloped mental children that they are. That's why taking risks FOR power is inconsistent with their USE of power. Because being indulged means never taking the risks yourself. Other people indulge you, OTHER people have the POWER TO indulge you. And you yourself do nothing. So if women who lust for power don't actually want power at all, and certainly are willing to do virtually nothing for it, then is it the case that men want power?

NO. Men do NOT want power. Men want ... to be wanted. That's why they value beauty, because beauty guarantees that you're desired. That, or handsomeness, or power. Yeah, power guarantees that women want you. Aaand that explains why anarcho-communists like Clinton and anarchists like Thatcher (who could never be accused of being a woman) got into politics. Why? Because they were wanted there. Everyone wanted them.

Men are good for something in the world after all whereas ever since the uterus has been devaluad, women are pretty much worthless. And they know it and they are pissed. That's why they've been complaining ever since the fertility rate fell down from 12 children per woman.

Finally, and this insight isn't original, but the simple fact that radiation is the safest thing in the universe. We know that extra radiation isn't harmful to life and that radiation is necessary for living things to function. So obviously there's the dose of radiation necessary to thrive and there's the dose that will kill you. And for water, it's 2-8 liters a day to thrive and 20 liters will kill you. For air, a mere 15 bar will make nitrogen toxic and removing the nitrogen is cheating of course. For radiation? ONE MILLION TIMES the necessary dose starts getting lethal.

Fear of radiation is like fear of cannabis. Oh no, it'll kill you! It'll give you cancer! It'll make Mexicans rape our women! People hate radiation because it's GOOD, because it's BETTER than they are. Because people are SCUM. Because people LIKE evil. If people met an angel, they'd murder it. That's why they murder nuclear power plants, because they are angels. Angels that provide poor humans, and not just elite scum, with heat and power so they don't starve and freeze to death. Yeah, let's murder them all! Because we want evil, because we want starvation and death. People make me sick.

You Means I

What could identity = equality = I = ego = self possibly mean in the context of group identity? Well, it means that You = I. For most people, the word "you" means I. And it's actually possible to hear that meaning when they use it. And no, I'm not talking about narcissists, that would be too fucking obvious.

It's noticeable when these people ask "where do you rewind the video?" that the "you" is indefinite and really means "I". Whereas I would say " Where the FUCK do you find the fucking rewind?" and there the "you" is definite and means "you the person that is not me".

Moralists lack any concept of mind or empathy or self-esteem or self-awareness. It's impossible to have self-esteem without a model of your own mind, and impossible to have a model without even a concept of it. And consciousness is not possessing a model of your own mind but merely attention of attention (attending to the fact you attend to things) or meta-attention.

Moralists believe the "mind" is the same identical thing as the brain. They are philosophical eliminationists, believing consciousness and the mind will be proven to not exist. At this, they are infinitely better than narcissists who believe that you are not your brain but rather are your face. If your face gets scarred then you have changed whereas if you brain gets lobotomized then you are still you.

Psychopaths don't even believe in the concept of brains unless they crack your skull open and poke in there and see them. And Right wing authoritarians believe the story that "you" are a brain is a mere convention which they will nod along to. Because the undead prove that brains can be eaten without affecting the person they are. Undeath will one day prove that you aren't brains.

So back to Moralists, they believe that all members of the group are equal and equally valuable, modulo leadership, and that you are judged by your actions. Since your actions are contingent on external pressure and social circumstances, your social circumstances dictate in large part what is you. Your brain merely implements an illusion of you as being different from other yous in the group which are all equally you.

Gaians believe the "mind" is a suspiciously empty container for memes, culture and biological urges. They believe that a person is their emotions, memories and other mindstate. When someone's mood changes they become a different person, when they acquire more memories, they become a different person, when they lose memories they become a different person. And if two people have the same emotions and memories then they are the same person.

So long as the addition and subtraction of memories can get from any person to any person (and Gaians believe memories define people) then "you" is exactly identical to "I" to Gaians. The only proviso is of course that different "I"s are at different stages of their life cycle. Some are more advanced and some are more retarded. Some are still being "taught to think" by their good master um parents, and others have already reproduced.

And it bears repeating, Gaians don't have any concept of mind. By "mind" they mean "the combination of the superego and the id" with no ego in between. Gaians believe that social pressure is a real thing and complain about how much it conflicts with their id. Now, you may be retarded enough to call this a "concept of mind" but that would make you the kind of retard that believes LEGO blocks are "construction material".

As proof that Gaians have no ego, I point to their naked and craven begging they engage in when they ask for favors. They say "it never hurts to ask" because they have no idea whether others will be inclined to agree or not, and because they have no ego to suffer shame or embarrassment. They talk about "the puppy dog eyes" because of course they beg for favors as cravenly as a dog begs its master for treats.

Incidentally, Gaian "self-esteem" is simply happiness since of course there is no concept of mind TO esteem and there is no ego to do the esteeming. And while I'm at it, I highly recommend Gaians as sex slaves since they love nothing better than servitude and being fucked. Unfortunately, they also love eating, sitting on their ass playing games, and see nothing wrong with getting fat, so you'll have to keep your sex slave on a diet.

Moving on, Freaks believe that "mind" is subjective awareness, and believe that "you" are your subjective experiences. They also believe that concepts and percepts "must be experienced" and cannot be communicated in any way, least of all language. That is why "you have to be here" for them to explain something trivial that they could have easily said on the phone. It is also why they become graphics designers obsessed with icons, audiovisuals and paralinguistics.

Freaks also believe that if two people share the same subjective experiences (eg, see the same thing because they are at the same physical location) then they are of "one mind" and possess a "common sense". Thus, by sitting close together, "you" becomes "I". And it is the reason why if they sense that you are unlike them in some way (eg, possess one of those mythical different personality types) then they will get gone after sexing you rather than cuddling.

To recap, Freaks are subjectivists and phenomenologists. And from those two facts it follows they are relativists since everyone can become anyone else by simple physical transposition. It's also the reason why Freaks are into movement, transportation, teleportation and unstoppability (as opposed to say invincibility). Because the more they move, the more they can experience, and amassing lots of different subjective experiences are the only thing that matters.

It's also why they're into shapeshifting, because by experiencing different things you become a different person since "you" is your experiences. Movement is just a degraded form of shapeshifting to them. It's also why they "move through life" when they age. As opposed to the Gaians who "advance" through their life cycle. Incidentally, Gaians also say they are "not that advanced" rather than "I'm not that smart" since "you equals I" means you can't be smarter than them.

Freaks also misuse "in your mind" to mean in your subjective awareness. Because again, they have no concept of mind, even less a model of it. Freaks can "just sense" when someone is different or the same as they are. In this same way, and by absolutely no coincidence, they can "just sense" true love rather than doomed love. Doomed love as would happen if the other person were "secretly" a psychopath, a narcissist or a yuppie.

Yet Freaks are very clear that personality types are mythical since "we are all different" and can't possibly be typed. Models of mind cannot be constructed and even if they could, they wouldn't be useful anyways. It is far better to go with the ideology of phenomenology and to hide the nasty discrepancies to this retarded ideology which your subconscious keeps throwing up.

Discrepancies such as the existence of Nazis, the Cold War, World War 2, World War 1, the 30 Years War, the Hundred Years War, ... you know, pretty much all of history. But then, Freaks aren't fans of history. Nor are they fans of anthropology except of course that it is marginal and so should be embraced the same way that goth hip hop should be embraced, and walking in the night being a vampire. It is bizarre, it is strange, therefore it is Freak. even if Freaks never actually go into that field.

Cannibalism of Eggs and Ham

The traditional English breakfast is sausage and eggs. The traditional American breakfast is bacon and eggs. The traditional X breakfast is ham and eggs. What do those things have in common?

Cannibalism. Pig is the only meat animal that's an omnivore and ... tastes like human. And eggs ... are fetuses. Often, cooked eggs are far too normal so the wannabe cannibal eats raw eggs like bodybuilders. It does a body good to eat fetuses.

Now, I'm not saying eggs and pig aren't tasty. I'm just saying that somebody with a fetish for them to the point of eating them raw or doing other bizarre things with them is clearly doing so for non-taste reasons. Such as, eggs and pig remind Narcissists that everything in life is at the expense of others.

So, why's cannibalism traditional? Because Right Wing Authoritarians are downright neighborly with Narcissists. And I use "neighborly" advisedly to mean "someone falling into the Uncanny Valley of likeness to myself thus needs to be shot".

So obviously, Right Wing Authoritarians will kill Narcissists for being cannibalistic savages that eat fetuses and human meat ... and then partake of it themselves. I mean, it just makes sense!

Well, it does to me but then I downright expect hypocrisy from people who are fucked in the head.

Right Wing Authoritarians' Obsession with Holes

Right wing authoritarians like Brian Wang over on NBF are obsessed with going out into space. They don't want to contact extraterrestrials. The mere fact that aliens don't exist hasn't stopped a single autistic moron from believing in aliens so that's not the reason for RWAs' disinterest in "aliens". Rather, RWAs are just not interested in organic life since it breaks down far too easily and can't be crafted. Nor do RWAs want to go to other planets or to explore "the final frontier". Nor do they want to go to the stars. No, they want to go out into space because space is empty and is The Void.

When Siths die they get cast into The Void. Louise de la Valiere the nazi bitch in Familiar of Zero is a Void Mage. And Warhammer makes everything better by putting it in Space. Elves ... in space! Orcs ... in space! Skeletal zombie robot empires ... in space! And of course, Warhammer makes Nazism look good, so calling it right-wing authoritarian is an insult to mere fascists, stasis and nazis. Warhammer represents the wet dreams of right-wing authoritarians.

Right-wing authoritarians love cubes, such as displayed by the Borg before Star Trek became a "franchise" and the enemy became someone OTHER than right-wing authoritarians. Why cubes? Becasue cubes stacked on top of each other have no holes. And this issue of holes vs no holes is sacred to right-wing authoritarians. Consider that prisons are made up of little cubes. As is Minecraft. As are cubicles. All neatly arranged little cubes caging people within them. And prisons have "the hole" where someone is reduced into nothing through sensory deprivation.

Consider that shitting is called "voiding your bowels" and RWAs are also called anal-retentive. That is, they are obsessed with making sure their bowels are full and don't have a hole in them. You can see the critical issue of hole vs no hole. It's also a critical issue in their sexual relations because right-wing authoritarians are masochistic. You see, it's psychopaths that are obsessed with their own cocks, as well as obelisks and cylinders and on and on. Gang bangs exist in order to add more cocks to a porn scene because obviously one isn't enough. To RWAs, one cock is too many.

Right wing authoritarians worship the sacred hole. The hole which brings forth infants (not children, the distinction is extremely important) which can then be beaten, abused, controlled and otherwise crafted into replicas of themselves to continue their Legacy. But the important thing here is that it's WOMEN that have the sacred hole, and men only have the dirty hole through which shit comes from. Also, dirtying the sacred hole by putting psychopathic cocks in them let alone injecting dirty water in them is disgusting.

Which also explains right-wing authoritarians' obsession with anal sex when women derive far more pleasure from their pussies. The sacred hole is too sacred to touch, and in any case, being masochists they're providing women the OPPORTUNITY to feel pain. Not that they enjoy it since only psychopaths are sadists, but they do know the woman will since all women are right-wing authoritarians just like they themselves so all women are masochistic.

Again we see the central tenet of right-wing authoritarian minds: who has the hole! Since women have holes they're to be worshiped and men are not worthy of being with them. So how do you solve this problem? Well, it depends on whether you're high libido or low libido. If you're low libido then you're going to want your (owned but sacred) woman to be a madona, chaste and pure and untouched. And of course providing infants through the miracle of virgin birth.

If you're high libido then things are going to look very different. Right wing authoritarians aren't into polyamory, that's anathema to them. Same for lesbianism (unnatural) or gang bangs (which really need to be distinguished from orgies and threesomes and swinging). Perhaps surprisingly, they're not into polygamy. Why would they want multiple women when men (having only a dirty hole) are obviously unworthy of owning a SINGLE woman. RWAs instead are into polyANDRY.

One woman, multiple men, that's how it should go. And how does this arrangement play out in modern society? Well, you've got whores with multiple clients. And given the fact that every person is either high libido or low libido and women are persons then it follows that ALL women are either madonas (low libido) or whores (high libido), or SHOULD be, since every good person is a right-wing authoritarian. Can you spell madona whore complex? I knew you could.

The alternative to whores is dommes, who are kinds of whores anyways. They're the kinds of right-thinking whores that have no problem crushing their clients' filthy rods and kicking them in their filthy spheres. Which they have the total right (and obligation!) to do since they have the holes whereas men merely have filthy rods and spheres. And RWAs hate spheres almost as much as they hate rods since spheres are the obsession of the RWAs (non-insane) self-righteous sanctimonious brethren. Holy sacred balls batman!

I'm always annoyed at juvenile scum writing stories where every male character winces because a woman kicks a man in the balls. Seriously, WTF? I don't give a shit and I'd kick someone who tried to kill me in the balls over and over until they died of fucking shock. But really, to right-wing authoritarians it's something that gives them sexual pleasure so all those stupid little "winces of male sympathy" grate on my nerves for how diametrically opposite to the truth they are. Also, "sympathy" is the province of scum. I hate sympathy and I hate scum confusing it with empathy or believing it superior.

There's a rumour that went around about Hitler, the leader of the brownshirts, that he was into scat. Now, idiots argue over whether or not the rumour is true, yet somehow they completely miss the fact the rumour's very existence meant most people considered it *believable* for a Nazi to be playing with shit. The same would not have been true if someone claimed Hitler was into bestiality, cumplay or watersports, those would have been aberrant to Hitler's right-wing authoritarian personality. But scat? That's entirely believable, especially after learning of how often the SS made Jews play with shit. And the fact that it's believable is far far more important than whether or not it's true.

But anyways, it's not true that most or even very many right-wing authoritarians want to play with feces, or are even willing to play with feces. Feces are biohazardous waste and far too closely associated with human beings' mortality. Although RWAs love human mortality ... go figure. What *IS* true is that they're ALL, every single last one of them, obsessed with holes. Who's got the hole? You will also note that when spheres stack on top of each other, they only fill 74% of space, leaving 26% holes. Another reason why the dirty sphere lovers are hated, those wrong-thinking bastards don't care about filling holes at all!

Another reason why cubes are so wonderful? When you pack cubes together and they make a hole ... it's a cube-shaped hole! Isn't that wonderful? Try to make that happen with filthy spheres!

In math and physics, rods are known as "one dimensional topological defects" and cubes are known as "three dimensional topological defects". I'll let you figure out what's a two dimensional topological defect and who could worship those.