Tuesday, December 28, 2010

Why Linux Is Decrepit Donkey Crap

Nobody seems to realize how truly ancient Linux is. We're living in the internet age when 5 years is a long time and 10 an eternity, yet Linux is over 40 years old. It wasn't known by that name 40 years ago but that hardly matters since it's hardly changed since. Linux dates back to a prehistoric era when computer dinosaurs roamed the Earth and stern patriarchs ruled the home. And it shows!

Dictatorship

Linux has 40 years' worth of mistakes and missed opportunities accumulated in a gigantic pile of crap. First was refusing to use a capability security model in favour of intrinsically broken access control lists. Oh sure, the morons at the time didn't know ACLs were intrinsically broken. What they DID know was that ACLs appealed to evil totalitarian power-hungry pieces of shit. Far from taking the hint, they considered it a plus! Which is why Linux's model of users is still based on Fascism.

Stalin would approve of a unique special super-user that has total control over every other user's existence. Everything from creating users to parceling out resources to controlling which groups exist and who belongs to them. Approve? That's putting it mildly. Stalin could only DREAM of having this much power. Yet moronic programmers don't think twice about the dictatorship that's hard-coded in this supposedly "multi-user" OS.

Apparently, not only do most people think totalitarian dictatorship's a fine solution to political problems, they also think it's the first and best solution. Something de rigueur and hardly worth mentioning. My mind boggles.

Low Level

The second mistake was becoming wedded to an intrinsically decrepit low-level programming language. I'll remind you that LISP had already been invented by then so it was clear that C was horrifically low-level. That too was considered a plus! But it didn't stop there since Ken Thompson made his inability to grasp higher-level abstractions blatant when he went on to create Plan 9 at Bell Labs.

Plan 9 is "what Unix should have been". It is an abject failure even by Thompson's rather miserable standards (processes aren't really files in Plan 9 and can't be copied using file tools). In 1980, Xerox PARC released Smalltalk-80. Did Ken Thompson learn anything from it? Fuck no. Throughout the 80s and even in the late 90s when object-orientation was the buzzword of the day, the whole concept of objects was completely beyond Ken Thompson. You see, he was still obsessed with FILES.

The fact that Linux failed to stick to its paradigm of everything-is-a-file when the need for a graphical system came along never made Thompson think twice about whether this pathetic files+bytestream filters paradigm was good enough. The fact that Smalltalk was awe-inspiringly beautiful apparently never crossed his mind either. No, he spent over a decade trying to redeem his failure. Trying to prove that he wasn't some overpaid loser that got lucky and struck it rich.

Which just goes to show: living in the past doesn't pay off, it only proves you're a loser has-been incapable of moving on. Ever heard of "moving on" Ken? Bah, never mind. Alan Kay never learned to move on after his failure to create a programming language for children either. Hint: it can't be done because half the population lacks analysis and can't master programming at any age.

No Graphics

That's another thing, Linux grew up long before 2D graphics was a gleam in anyone's eyes. And it never, ever integrated it. X Window is a piece of crap that's officially "not part of the operating system" despite the fact it had to run as super-user with the ability to crash the machine at will. This was considered a plus!

That's right, just because a major piece of the programmatic base of the machine violates ALL OF the fundamental principles of the OS, that's no cause for concern. Just say it's "not part of the OS" and you can pat yourself on the back for fixing the problem. And who cares if they don't integrate together?

I mean, it's not like anyone would ever want the window they're using to be given absolute priority by the machine! It's not like Linux is suddenly an interactive operating system just because it's suddenly got graphics. Who cares if windows suddenly become unresponsive? Batch processing and teletypes are so much better! It's not like users want to actually be in control. It's not like they want the machine to be responsive.

More than 25 years later, and Linux still can't handle 2D graphics correctly. How many years has it been since 3D graphics became commonplace? At the rate it's stagnating, Linux will have integrated 3D graphics in about 100 years. That's 50 years for the first half-wit systems developer to grasp what 3D is good for in operating systems, and another 50 years for Linux to get it. So yeah, in the year 2110, Linux might be fit for use by our generation.

Metaphors Make Bad Models

Let's not even go into the "desktop" and "office" metaphors. Because the whole notion of using, let alone relying on, metaphors in systems design is vile, repulsive and disgusting. It's the kind of crap that ought to get your design credentials revoked for life. Yet again, software developers consider it a plus! Then again, software developers have always been pretty contemptuous of everyday users.

Fucking "icons" as if users were weak-minded retarded morons who can't possibly learn what an object's representation means without it superficially resembling something completely different they're already overly familiar with. You'd almost think users were as retarded as software developers. That'll be the day. When users spend all of their time on projects 90% of which fail to deliver any value to anyone then we can start comparing users to developers.

Fucking technological obsession, as if there weren't perfectly good buttons on the keyboard to use in concert with a button-less mouse. Ever heard of synergy?! It's a word. If you don't know what it means then go back, back to the 80s! But no, a mouse is a Holy Technological Artifact and a keyboard is a Completely Separate Holy Technological Artifact, and never the twain shall meet in the mind of the users. Why, it would be sacrilege!

Ever wonder why there has to be a metaphor of the physical mouse inside of the user's model of their workspace? I did and the answer is obvious: because software developers are too fucking stupid to understand "the user's model of their workspace". In fact, software developers are too fucking stupid to understand that what's inside the computer isn't their workspace!

Proof: you only have one mouse, so you "should" have only one mouse pointer, right? Wrong! You should have two. That way you can swap between them at will. You leave one somewhere then swap and move the other one to the other end, then hit some key (on the keyboard) and all the objects between your pointers get selected. It is fucking obvious when you think about it. It is fucking obvious when you're unhappy with drag-selection being modal and bother to spend just a few hours coming up with something better!

Yet it's equally "obvious" to an OS developer that what's inside your workspace really belongs to them. They're programming software drivers for one mouse so in their atrophied minds, it's obvious there can only be one pointer. Never mind what's in your mind, because you don't matter!

Conclusion

It's amazingly difficult to convey exactly how ancient, how capricious, how fucked up, and how totally dysfunctional this piece of crapware called Linux is.

It's vile, incoherent, inconsistent, contradictory, meaningless, arbitrary, senseless, ad hoc, unprincipled, bloated, arrogant, dictatorial, fetid, rotten, corrupt, and just plain evil. That's when it's working. When its laughable insecurity (called "security" for some incomprehensible reason - I suppose it sounds better) hasn't been cracked open like an eggshell, your computer crashed and all your data corrupted.

And do you want to know why? It's because software developers are egotistical pricks. They have the same cognitive type as engineers, physicists and economists. But they have fewer limitations imposed on their work. They don't answer to physical reality, they don't answer to their peers thirsting for power & knowledge, and they don't answer to rich & powerful masters wanting to oppress the poor. They answer only to themselves. And that's why Linux is a pile of decrepit unusable crap.

To a software developer, running amock having "fun" is called hacking ... and it's a plus!


A warning to the people
The good and the evil
This is war

28 comments:

Richard Kulisz said...

Hmm, I think I'd get hits from google on this post if I renamed it to Why Linux Sucks. Am I enough of an attention whore to give up a great title? No, no I'm not.

Any suggestions?

Anonymous said...

Hmmm as a linux user I have to agree but hell,i've nothing else to do but fuck about getting know where,thats what linux is about,right?

Richard Kulisz said...

Or a PC user. It's been theorized as far back as two decades ago that the main psychological difference between a Mac and PC user is the latter gets a feeling of achievement or satisfaction from getting their machine to work at all.

Elias said...

& How's Your Kernel coming along, Hmm? You know, that OS you've been working on? Will I be able to download, try & install if for free? Can I burn it to a DVD, CD, USB stick, SD card or install over a network? Can I modify the source code to suit my individual hardware & software needs? Do you have a dedicated community of developers willing to volunteer their time & services to improve my user experience? Will Kulix be used on the next supercomputers & my next smartphone?

Richard Kulisz said...

Mendacious idiotic assholes like you is exactly why Linux sucks. Not that it will do you any good Elias since you're far, far too stupid (and an idiot) to understand, but writing an OS from the kernel out is idiotic in the extreme. And it's why it's only ever worked twice. With CP/M and Unix. So go away you wretched moronic shit-lover.

Anonymous said...

So you are asserting that having a super-user account is stupid?

There is a reason that accounts are tiered, it is because of file and system access. If every user on a banks network had access to all the database files, system files etc then a crackers job just became 10-20 times easier. The reason that accounts are tiered is because only people who should have access to certain files and network area's are the only ones who do get that access.

Honestly, that paragraph of misinformed bullshit alone made me realize you're a pathetic troll who has no idea what he is talking about. Run off back to your mac you raging idiot, it's quite obvious you can't use a computer without having everything fucking spoon-fed to you.

Anonymous said...

LOL. I needed a laugh today. I agree, Linux is crap. Decided to play with it awhile on an old machine I'm about to retire. After a few hours trying to get it to see all the hardware (that XP or "7" can find by itself) I gave up. If I got to go to the command-prompt just to get an O/S running these days then the O/S is still stuck in the 80's.

Anonymous said...

Would you like your computer to be a democracy?

How about giving lil' ole me a say in how your computer works?

Actually, it's not your computer, because it's nobody's. Why are you dictating it you remorseless DICTATOR?

Richard Kulisz said...

Ahh, the knee jerk binarism of the truly stupid. If you criticize socialism then you must be a right-winger - and not a communist. Or in American terms, if you're not a filthy right-wing liberal (Democrat) then you must be a fascist, and not a real left-winger. If you're not black then you must be white, instead of yellow.

Marian Smith said...

WOW what angst, X11 had windows before mshit had windows.X11 is not part of the operating system because it's not meant to be so no BSOD, X crashes you have a console damn that sucks. As for C you go write to hardware in lisp and see how far you get, I await your hardware interface libraries without holding my breath, just because you can't code is no reason to complain. Linux installs on everything I have used in the last 11 years, sure 0.99l was harder but hey I'm not computer illiterate. Buy OSX I know it's only based on BSD which is you know unix but shhh don't tell anyone and you can pretend steve jobs made it.

Richard Kulisz said...

HAHAHA. You are a retarded fucking monkey! Amusing though. Dance monkey dance!

I don't take passive people like you seriously. You have no values, you have no judgement, you have no will.

You're not really a person as far as I'm concerned.

You think X crashing is acceptable ... because other people say so.

You think writing to hardware is important ... because other people say so.

You think interfacing to hardware matters ... because other people say so.

You think being a "coder" is a mark of distinction rather than scorn ... because other people say so!

You think being "computer literate" means anything at all ... because other people say so!

You think Steve Jobs is a hero to be lionized (rather than a monster and a Demonic force of pure Evil) ... because other people say so!

You think OSX is meaningfully different from Unix or either from Windows (rather than their being retarded incestuous cousins) ... because other people say so!

You don't really have any thoughts of your own at all. (amused) Like I said, you're not really a person!

And the best part? You are completely, hopelessly LOST trying to make heads or tails of me. Because unlike you I'm my own person.

BlogiBlogiBlogiBlogiT said...

ja, it's funny to see such ignorant people talking about what they can't even comprehend, this guy is obviously frustrated because he wasn't even able to know how to use the "ls" command , or because it's a vagrant with just primary-level education that never needed to debug a program or make a serious engineering or scientific work ,but i understand, such pathetic monkeys that only does use a computer for chating or playing browser based games could never understand the freedom and power of open source software, so, have fun playing, my beloved pig, your puny mind can't see beyond the chains that bind you to Gate's or Job's dick

Mustang Rt said...

if you send soldiers to war, do you give them completely disassembled tanks ???

Michael Lawson said...

After having to deal with file rights issues caused by sudo and fixed via chmod, chgrp and chown, I must concur. Linux sucks donkey balls.

Here's a tip: Never run a command as sudo unless you need to. Good luck knowing whether or not you need to. Good luck keeping your environment clear in your mind when doing anything that moves, copies or touches files or directories.

SeljakNaNetu said...

the only thing linux is good for is wasting my fucking time. here I spend the entire day trying to get a program to work and to no avail whereas in fucking windows (yea boo, made for retarded mokeys etc) it would be as easy as doubleclicking a fucking .exe

you pathetic shit eating linux drones can go drown in shit.

and yes, shit is also free, so have at it. on another note you can get methane from shit so it's still more useful than linux.

go suck a donkey cock.

BADSHAH P KGM said...

yaa.. Linux is shit for home use.
But i think it is what is called liberty.
A free man have to work more than a slave to get what he intent.But for slave what he intent is what his master intent.

Samuel Asadi said...

There's a Turkish proverb saying: there's no good steak with free meat!
the whole Linux distroes with all bunch of funky programming languages designed for them are piece of absolute crap.
There's no use in using Linux at all. On all hardware, Windows operates perfect. Now, when you install Linux on your piece of hardware, you can see the difference.

Jason Alf said...

I agree with Richard. I've been using Linux since Redhat 7. I've used differnt distro's on numerous different motherboard/cpu combo's and out of the 100's of installs done, I can remember 2 or 3 that went flawlessly. Same amount of windows installs and I can recall 5 to 10 that failed. If after 40 years the "developers" still can't get linux to work properly than something is wrong. People want their computer to work, not spend hours searching forums and howto's just to get their pc to function correctly. All this talk about linux being wonderful and easy to use reminds me of politicians who promise the world but deliver a 20 year old atlas. I just installed lubuntu 14 next to xp on an old p4 machine. Everything works fine in Xp but lubuntu locks up the mouse within 4 seconds of logon. That isn't a useable computer. That's inneptitude and incompetence. I've tried mint 17 on the same computer and can't even get to a login screen; text or graphical. These linux fan bois can praise linux all they want but until they get this simple stuff right then they'll stay stuck with the meagre market share. I love/hate linux but it has so much potential going to waste. Get the bloody screen and mouse going and maybe people with give it a go. Windows has improved immensely over the years but linux still can't get a mouse and screen working. That tells me a lot.

eddie mccloy said...

I so much enjoyed the start of this article. Then I read the comments and realised the author is a fan of the shittest linux version EVAH - OS X.

:facepalm:

Michael said...

You haven't put Unix in a historial context. C was developed because it was too hard\error prone\unproductive to write programs in assembly language. Unix is obsessed with files because they are necessary. See how Unix handles 20000+ files in a fresh Moodle installation with ease compared with Windows. Microsoft even had to write a wrapper for their Windows API to get C Programmers on side. In Windows fopen() is a wrapper for CreateFile().


Unix as a web server or embedded in a telephone exchange or in a bank is fine. At home the fun applications run on other operating systems.


In a historical context CPM didn't even have subdirectories.
Digital with VMS didn't last long. The point of Unix is input and output. Fast.

Then there is the process model. Unix can fork() something Windows didn't replicate until the mid 90s with multi-threading and mad COM out-of-process nonsense.

File permissions can be a nightmare, I admit, but you just do the minimum to get by. That's good enough.

Michael said...

You haven't put Unix in a historial context. C was developed because it was too hard\error prone\unproductive to write programs in assembly language. Unix is obsessed with files because they are necessary. See how Unix handles 20000+ files in a fresh Moodle installation with ease compared with Windows. Microsoft even had to write a wrapper for their Windows API to get C Programmers on side. In Windows fopen() is a wrapper for CreateFile().


Unix as a web server or embedded in a telephone exchange or in a bank is fine. At home the fun applications run on other operating systems.


In a historical context CPM didn't even have subdirectories.
Digital with VMS didn't last long. The point of Unix is input and output. Fast.

Then there is the process model. Unix can fork() something Windows didn't replicate until the mid 90s with multi-threading and mad COM out-of-process nonsense.

File permissions can be a nightmare, I admit, but you just do the minimum to get by. That's good enough.

Richard Kulisz said...

Well, Gaian scum, "the minimum to get by" just isn't good enough.

C was invented after LISP already existed, so it is a historical downgrade.

UNIX was explicitly a castrated version of MULTICS. People knew better than to create access control lists but they still did because it provided for caste-based social organizations of users. Which is something you value positively and something that any sane person (ie, a person NOT of your personality type) despises and deplores.

Go collar yourself you worthless slave. Maybe someone will enslave you and you'll have a master to take care of your sexual needs. Because for a certainty you have no brain and no mind to think with. Everything with you is about consumer demand and not about abstractions or concepts, because your brain is incapable of processing either abstractions OR concepts.

So basically, you should never speak to me as you are of an inferior caste to me. And you will remember this after I slap you in the face sufficiently. And oh how much I wish I could slap you across the face right now. I would do so hard with the back of my hand, and then I would pull out brass knuckles as a warning.

Shut the fuck up you retarded unthinking dereistic evolution-worshiping Gaian scum. You fucking mutant abortion of evolution.

Pancho6666 said...

I gotta say I found that post highly satisfactory after a month of having to wrestle with this piece of shit linux invention. The developers don't give a fuck about user-experience. I don't think they are capable of comprehending even the surface of it at this point. What else would lead them to implementing such disastrous decisions as the ones I stumbled upon. Jesus fuck. It's so frustrating. And they'll dismiss this frustration.

But when I think of it, you have to be pretty abnormal to spend years sitting at home coding.

You have to be pretty abnormal to sit on IRC year after year talking about linux.

It doesn't seem like they give a damn about their own experience, and it follows they'll dismiss others experience.

I found it pretty insightful that one of the reasons this disaster came to fruition is because they don't answer to anyone and are not connected to tangible results. Had that been the case the feedback from real life would have set linux straight.

I'm counting the months until I have enough money to switch to OS X.

What a piece of shit of operating system.

Btw I've beaten the shit out of one of the contributors to the linux kernel back in the day, for acting like a backward donkey piece of shit when trying to get up a project with him. That's what would have happened if there was somebody to answer to. Enough is fucking enough. Pieces of shit living in a bubble. Get fucked.

dddvvv said...

The author sees beyond everyday horizon! His criticism of the OS tells the story of developers with only technical knowledge.

In my opinion a wise way to approach this is to know yourself. Do what Victor E. Frankl says - do it yourself. Only then you can find meaning.

A practical guide to DIY:

- don't try to replace everything at once. there are thousands of man years of work.

- first do conceptual blockbusting. this is hard. you are grasping at concepts worth years of study.

- erode the existing system. capture the concepts in LISP. where you don't have time use existing functionality. otherwise DIY the concept.

- enable communication in the system

- repeat

Anonymous said...

Linux is shit and will always be shit. Windows 10 forever!

Anonymous said...

Do not lump Unix and Linux together as if they are one and the same.

Linux is a hack (kludge) of Unix, and it is not nearly the same quality of coding.

Torvalds convinced a bunch of people (via Usenet) to join his circle-jerk and hack an OS. I've tried Linux many times over the past 20 years (and used BSD and Irix also). I see no real progress with Linux on the desktop. Yeah, there are some new DE/GUI choices, mostly the same paradigm.

The fact is, most 'distros' can't even set 1920x1080 native resolution in a VM or bare metal. This is the most common monitor resolution for the past 10+ years. Most distros cannot even self-configure networking. Hell, Windows 2000 did it better.

Open-Solaris and BSD can self-configure networking and 1920x1080 res, both offer ZFS, and do -not- use systemd.

Moreover, Windows 10 Enterprise (LTSB) features a developer mode with a complete Linux shell, capable of running various GUI's with a few tweaks. Linux apps? Most were cloned from Unix.

Internet, web, and File Servers? Many are BSD based boxes (OpenBSD, FreeBSD, etal).


Why the hell does anyone bother with Linus' kludge when we've got Unix, OSX, and Win10 + bash?

Richard Kulisz said...

You are a retarded moron who cannot comprehend how there are things beyond Unix and so all Unix is in the same category regardless of implementation.

Anonymous said...

Agreed so hard. Linux is pile of garbage.