Saturday, May 16, 2015

The French do Politics ... in Song

English speaking culture has its moments as far as politics in song goes. There's Bob Dylan's one song which is kind of an outlier where he plainly says, 'you right-wing authoritarian and narcissist warmonging scum, I want to watch you die and I'll see your dead bodies'. Then you've got Leonard Cohen who isn't that impressive but hopeful. Then of course there's Cat Stevens enjoining and inviting everyone to peace. Then there's 4 Non Blondes' What's Going On, questioning the world. And of course John Lenon's Imagine which is just "picture this".

The problem is that this pales in comparison to French songs. Bob Dylan's "I'll watch" is the high note of his political work whereas Patrick Bruel's "I will DO" is pretty much par for the course where he's concerned. See the difference? I'll watch passively while your life runs out, vs I will fucking DO something. Even if it's just screaming himself hoarse about the horrors of the world, it's not enjoining, it's not inviting, it's not asking, it's not begging, it is DOING. And that's a low mark for Bruel.

Another really big difference is that in France, it's okay to be viciously against corrupt priestly do nothings. Also known as Gaian "environmentally-aware" pacifists in the USA. In North America ... it isn't. In the USA, because of Vietnam and the pathetic free love backwash from France's May 1968, do-nothing pacifist Gaians are considered sacred. You can't scorn them, mock them or diss them. In France ... well they had a whole revolution where "the last king was strangled with the guts of the last priest". They don't fucking like priests over there, especially not corrupt priests who care only about the status quo.

Even when the Gaians in question aren't filthy corrupt priests but just your scummy parents expecting you to walk in their footsteps to maintain the do-nothing status quo of tokenistic self-concerned "peace". In France, that's enough to say a giant fuck you accompanied by thousands of audience members in a giant sing along. In the USA, they're sacred. In France, FUCK. YOU.

They told me: don't ask yourself too many questions
You know little guy, it's life that answers you
What's the use of wanting to know everything?
Look up and see what you can see

They told me: You have to listen to your father
Mine didn't say anything when he split
My mom told me: You're too little to understand
And I grew up with a place to take up

Who's got the right, who's got the right,
who's got the right to do this
To a child who really believes
what grown ups tell him

We spend our life saying thank you
Thank you to whom, to what?
To make rain fall and the sun shine
For children to whom we lie

They told me that men are all the same
There's many gods, but only a single Sun
Yes but, the Sun shines or burns
You die of thirst or else you drink bubbly

To you too I'm sure they told you plenty
Some nice stories, yeah right ... just bullshit!
So now here we find ourselves on the road
with our fears, our anxieties and our doubts 
Who's got the right? Who's got the right?
Who's got the right to do this to children,
who really believe, what grown ups tell them.

French politics is a whole notch above American politics because it's active instead of being Passive. But it's up ANOTHER notch due to who exactly does the politics. In France ... everyone. In the USA, most of the "anti-warmonger and anti-pacifist" crowd have gotten completely alienated from politics due to the warmongers' dominance and the pacifists' seal of approval to the status quo.

Those last two may seem like strange allies if you're an idiot until even idiots realize that "you can have your war so long as you don't involve me" is what "pacifists" are all about. Pacifism is all about disgusting craven assholes ensuring their own survival and NOTHING else. It makes me want to murder them. (Pacifists should learn to shut the fuck up about their disgusting pacifism if they care about their own skin.)

In the USA, the do-nothing pacifist scum are held up as some kind of angels or something compared to the warmonging scum. As if they were any fucking different. Letting injustice happen is exactly the same as approving of injustice and committing injustice, the outcome is exactly identical. Letting a murder happen with only token protest is exactly identical to murdering someone, you still end up with a dead body at the end. So long as warmonging scum continue to exist, do nothing Gaians will be guilty of all of their crimes. And in the USA, THAT is what gets held up as an example of enlightenment and principles. Disgusting.

So that's half the reason French politics is so superior. It's violently anti-pacifist. And India? India should be fucking nuked with nuclear bombs. That hotbed of disgusting fucking pacifism should be razed down to the last man, woman and child. A nice nuclear exchange between Pakistan and India would do the whole region an enormous amount of good. Pacifists can only be tolerated in regions where they shut the fuck up and sit in their corner, not where they dominate and choke minds to death with their stifling mysticism and obsessions with circles, cycles, wheels, turn ons, and karma.

Friday, May 08, 2015

Right Wing Authoritarians' Obsession with Holes

Right wing authoritarians like Brian Wang over on NBF are obsessed with going out into space. They don't want to contact extraterrestrials. The mere fact that aliens don't exist hasn't stopped a single autistic moron from believing in aliens so that's not the reason for RWAs' disinterest in "aliens". Rather, RWAs are just not interested in organic life since it breaks down far too easily and can't be crafted. Nor do RWAs want to go to other planets or to explore "the final frontier". Nor do they want to go to the stars. No, they want to go out into space because space is empty and is The Void.

When Siths die they get cast into The Void. Louise de la Valiere the nazi bitch in Familiar of Zero is a Void Mage. And Warhammer makes everything better by putting it in Space. Elves ... in space! Orcs ... in space! Skeletal zombie robot empires ... in space! And of course, Warhammer makes Nazism look good, so calling it right-wing authoritarian is an insult to mere fascists, stasis and nazis. Warhammer represents the wet dreams of right-wing authoritarians.

Right-wing authoritarians love cubes, such as displayed by the Borg before Star Trek became a "franchise" and the enemy became someone OTHER than right-wing authoritarians. Why cubes? Becasue cubes stacked on top of each other have no holes. And this issue of holes vs no holes is sacred to right-wing authoritarians. Consider that prisons are made up of little cubes. As is Minecraft. As are cubicles. All neatly arranged little cubes caging people within them. And prisons have "the hole" where someone is reduced into nothing through sensory deprivation.

Consider that shitting is called "voiding your bowels" and RWAs are also called anal-retentive. That is, they are obsessed with making sure their bowels are full and don't have a hole in them. You can see the critical issue of hole vs no hole. It's also a critical issue in their sexual relations because right-wing authoritarians are masochistic. You see, it's psychopaths that are obsessed with their own cocks, as well as obelisks and cylinders and on and on. Gang bangs exist in order to add more cocks to a porn scene because obviously one isn't enough. To RWAs, one cock is too many.

Right wing authoritarians worship the sacred hole. The hole which brings forth infants (not children, the distinction is extremely important) which can then be beaten, abused, controlled and otherwise crafted into replicas of themselves to continue their Legacy. But the important thing here is that it's WOMEN that have the sacred hole, and men only have the dirty hole through which shit comes from. Also, dirtying the sacred hole by putting psychopathic cocks in them let alone injecting dirty water in them is disgusting.

Which also explains right-wing authoritarians' obsession with anal sex when women derive far more pleasure from their pussies. The sacred hole is too sacred to touch, and in any case, being masochists they're providing women the OPPORTUNITY to feel pain. Not that they enjoy it since only psychopaths are sadists, but they do know the woman will since all women are right-wing authoritarians just like they themselves so all women are masochistic.

Again we see the central tenet of right-wing authoritarian minds: who has the hole! Since women have holes they're to be worshiped and men are not worthy of being with them. So how do you solve this problem? Well, it depends on whether you're high libido or low libido. If you're low libido then you're going to want your (owned but sacred) woman to be a madona, chaste and pure and untouched. And of course providing infants through the miracle of virgin birth.

If you're high libido then things are going to look very different. Right wing authoritarians aren't into polyamory, that's anathema to them. Same for lesbianism (unnatural) or gang bangs (which really need to be distinguished from orgies and threesomes and swinging). Perhaps surprisingly, they're not into polygamy. Why would they want multiple women when men (having only a dirty hole) are obviously unworthy of owning a SINGLE woman. RWAs instead are into polyANDRY.

One woman, multiple men, that's how it should go. And how does this arrangement play out in modern society? Well, you've got whores with multiple clients. And given the fact that every person is either high libido or low libido and women are persons then it follows that ALL women are either madonas (low libido) or whores (high libido), or SHOULD be, since every good person is a right-wing authoritarian. Can you spell madona whore complex? I knew you could.

The alternative to whores is dommes, who are kinds of whores anyways. They're the kinds of right-thinking whores that have no problem crushing their clients' filthy rods and kicking them in their filthy spheres. Which they have the total right (and obligation!) to do since they have the holes whereas men merely have filthy rods and spheres. And RWAs hate spheres almost as much as they hate rods since spheres are the obsession of the RWAs (non-insane) self-righteous sanctimonious brethren. Holy sacred balls batman!

I'm always annoyed at juvenile scum writing stories where every male character winces because a woman kicks a man in the balls. Seriously, WTF? I don't give a shit and I'd kick someone who tried to kill me in the balls over and over until they died of fucking shock. But really, to right-wing authoritarians it's something that gives them sexual pleasure so all those stupid little "winces of male sympathy" grate on my nerves for how diametrically opposite to the truth they are. Also, "sympathy" is the province of scum. I hate sympathy and I hate scum confusing it with empathy or believing it superior.

There's a rumour that went around about Hitler, the leader of the brownshirts, that he was into scat. Now, idiots argue over whether or not the rumour is true, yet somehow they completely miss the fact the rumour's very existence meant most people considered it *believable* for a Nazi to be playing with shit. The same would not have been true if someone claimed Hitler was into bestiality, cumplay or watersports, those would have been aberrant to Hitler's right-wing authoritarian personality. But scat? That's entirely believable, especially after learning of how often the SS made Jews play with shit. And the fact that it's believable is far far more important than whether or not it's true.

But anyways, it's not true that most or even very many right-wing authoritarians want to play with feces, or are even willing to play with feces. Feces are biohazardous waste and far too closely associated with human beings' mortality. Although RWAs love human mortality ... go figure. What *IS* true is that they're ALL, every single last one of them, obsessed with holes. Who's got the hole? You will also note that when spheres stack on top of each other, they only fill 74% of space, leaving 26% holes. Another reason why the dirty sphere lovers are hated, those wrong-thinking bastards don't care about filling holes at all!

Another reason why cubes are so wonderful? When you pack cubes together and they make a hole ... it's a cube-shaped hole! Isn't that wonderful? Try to make that happen with filthy spheres!

In math and physics, rods are known as "one dimensional topological defects" and cubes are known as "three dimensional topological defects". I'll let you figure out what's a two dimensional topological defect and who could worship those.

Sunday, May 03, 2015

Why Atheists Are Stupid

Mankind has always created the gods in His own image, and so it came to pass that when mankind sought to become unified, it created God. The God that domesticated wheat and invented language and created the ability to see, all things which Mankind is responsible for. God is Mankind's representation of Itself to Itself. And that is why worshiping God is dumb as fuck.

The God of the Old Testament commanded people to worship the representation of Mankind. Meaning, people were worshiping themselves. How fucking narcissistic is that!! But do you know what's worse than worshiping God? Fearing God, being "God-fearing". Because it means you're a pathetic mewling infant scared of people and scared of your own species.

Even respecting God is too much to ask. What exactly is there to respect? Humanity is, in theory, a wondrous phenomenal species. And in practice is a total pile of crap that hasn't succeeded in eradicating war, disease, poverty, and death. In fact, you can find half a billion filthy pantheists on Earth who'll tell you these things SHOULDN'T be eradicated.

Of course, much of the blame for that is laid at the feet of anti-human cesspits like India and China, let alone Africa. Places that never believed in Humanity aka God. But even omitting all of these Hells, to which you'll be exiled if you can't get along with your fellow first worlders so be good, let's face it: God is a schizophrenic autistic shithead. Not deserving of respect!

But beyond the stupidity of respecting God, beyond the idiocy of worshiping God, beyond the utter dysfunctional patheticness  of fearing God, there lies the utter retardation of refusing to acknowledge its existence. Or even worse, being sanctimonious about refusing to acknowledge your own species' existence.

This is why atheists are the lowest of the low. Not only are they too stupid to figure out what God is, but they use their stupidity as an excuse to deny God's existence! Hey how about that, I'm sure there are plenty of people too stupid to comprehend what the Sun is. But do THEY deny the Sun exists? NO! Do they claim "Helios doesn't exist, only the Sun does"? NO!

One can only conclude that atheists AREN'T denying their own species' existence. How can that be when by definition they deny God's? Well, it's because they aren't human. What the fuck are they then, Cthulhu?! Yeah, atheists are solipsistic Cthulhus creatures denying that Mankind exists. Shapeshifting is the only possible explanation for why human-appearing creatures deny humanity exists.

Seriously though, atheism is the opium of sanctimonious primitives, and I am proudly ecclesiastical! Oh man, I think the only people who'll ever agree with me are Jesuits. I always did like them, very hardcore those fuckers. Not Karl Marx though, he's so stupid he wrote hundreds and hundreds of pages on a topic too obvious for words. Three volumes on communism? You might as well write three volumes on why we need the color blue. It's in the fucking sky! Like God.

For anyone questioning whether I'm serious, I like my parody to be 100% truthful and logical. It makes it funnier that way.

Monday, April 27, 2015

Gutlessness Never Helped Anyone Avoid Embarrassment

There exist people who are unable and unwilling to process intense negative emotions. Emotions like contempt, disgust, loathing, and murderous. Since they can't process feeling murderous, their answer to the question of what kinds of people they would kill and for what reasons, is nobody, at any time and for any reason, under any circumstance whatsoever. And for this reason, many of them feel virtuous.

Of course, the consequence of being unable to process disgust is that they cannot stay away from people who disgust them, people who are bad for them. That's a mental catastrophe waiting to happen because they'll let themselves get close to parasites and leechers who will drain them dry financially and emotionally. So effectively, gutless people are passively suicidal since disgust is necessary to mental stability just as much as pain is necessary to physical well-being.

Pain doesn't tell you when your body is being damaged and about to die, nor does it teach any such thing. By that point in time, the point where a lion has his claws in you, it's far too late to do anything about it. No, pain teaches you when YOU are hurting your own body. By pinching yourself too hard, by nicking yourself with a knife, by sleeping on one side constantly. Those things cause pain because if you do them on a long-term basis you will kill yourself.

So too disgust teaches you not to avoid mental torture at the hands of others, but rather to avoid hurting yourself emotionally, mentally, and psychologically. By staying away from people and jobs and companies and situations which you are disgusted by. It isn't the narcissist that is hurting you and taking advantage of you, it is yourself that is hurting you by staying in a relationship with the narcissist. You can blame gutlessness for such pathetic victim stories.

But let's set aside the fact that gutlessness is contrary to mental self-preservation and is passively suicidal. Or that the unwillingness to act negatively in negative circumstances is pathetic as fuck to witness. We will focus on something infinitely more prosaic and ordinary and yet infinitely more important precisely for its ordinariness. The avoidance of embarrassment by making mistakes.

After all, let's say you kill a psychopathic serial killer like the Joker but it turns out they killed only in self-defense and aren't psychopathic and they're not even the Joker but a tied up hostage wearing a mask the Joker put on them. Killing is a bit extreme, final, and irreversible so what if you make a mistake? Wouldn't you feel dumb? Or ashamed or guilty or something else? Isn't the consequence of making a terrible mistake inevitably some kind of intense negative emotion? Shouldn't intense negative emotions be avoided entirely in order to reduce the chances of mistakes?

But mistakes happen in a probabilistic complex universe. You're afraid of them? They're fucking inevitable! And if you believe that feeling certain of yourself and then later on your course of action turning out to be completely wrong makes you feel dumb, that's because you're not looking at it correctly. Because inaction brings no surety. false uncertainty brings no safety. It's impossible for a 2 liter brain to thoroughly think through a 10^89 liter physical universe.

After all, do you feel dumb if the laws of physics change under you? Would you feel dumb if someone appeared and said, and proved, that the universe is a game simulation in a 100 dimensional universe run by aliens? It's not about factoring in what you know versus what you don't know, it's about the fact everything is a probability distribution and there's no reason to factor in things with infinitesimal probability.

So you make a mistake, so what? You move on and deal with it. your mistakes are just obstacles like in parkour, things to run over. There's a world of difference between being dumb and making a mistake. mistakes you learn from. being dumb you generally don't. and gutless people are being very dumb in how they approach facts and embarrassment.

You don't feel bad for not accounting for an infinitesimal probability.
You don't feel bad for not having the time to account for a small probability.
You SHOULD feel dumb if you act all shy and awkward and uncertain that you can't own up to your major-probability approximation after one hour's calculation.
You SHOULD feel dumb if you never voice what you know to be true because you're worried about the 1% or 0.1% or 1 in a million probability of being wrong

You make mistakes. It happens. It's an inevitable fact of living in a probabilistic universe. An inevitable fact of being a finite being in a much, MUCH bigger universe than itself. The universe is fucking 10^53 kilos when your brain is 1 kilo. So you should feel very, very dumb for ever expecting your 1 kg brain to grasp the entire 10^53 kg universe before it decides on courses of action. This is not a functional way to approach reality.

Let's say you kill 1000 people for being psychopaths, and 10 of them turn out to be innocents and 1 of them turns out to be an anti-psychopath. How many people would those 989 psychopaths have murdered if you hadn't killed them? I call this a win. It doesn't mean you don't IMPROVE your detection mechanisms if you're bothered they're so poor, but it doesn't mean you lose any sleep over it either.

Doing nothing doesn't mean the universe is on hold or on pause around you. The universe keeps going and people keep dying while it keeps going, and psychopaths keep killing while you worry about who's a psychopath and who isn't. While you worry about not killing innocent people, innocent people are dying due to your inactions. Because inaction is a type of action after all, just a despicable kind of action that denies all agency and personhood. A type of action that revels in humans' atavistic nature and makes them no better than animals.

That said, doing nothing is fairly acceptable if you judge the universe to be wholly and entirely positive. After all, what needs to be changed in that circumstance? Just enjoy it while it lasts. But then, people don't resort to violence unless they judge things to be negative, and usually very negative. It's not true that people are gutless because they're scared of being wrong or scared of violence. It's the reverse. Gutlessness causes fear of being wrong and fear of violence.

When you're capable of processing intense negative emotions, intensely negative things like mistakes and errors in judgement and innocent people dying are just a fact of life. (And here the Gaian says Aha, shrugs their shoulders and is happy that people die, because it's a "fact of life" and life is sacred to them. Okay, screw this.) So as I said, they're facts of the universe and facts of reality. And your job is to optimize or maximin or equalize the negatives, not to avoid them entirely. You can avoid the negatives once you possess full control over the physical universe, and not one second earlier.

Yet another salient point is that when bad things happen, or even when you cause bad things to happen, the emotional response is NOT generally speaking embarrassment or shame or stupefaction or things like that. There are a LOT more negative emotions than that! There's rage, frustration, anger, determination, grimness, resignation, depression ... and those things are a lot closer to victory than happiness is. You know what negativity tastes like? It tastes like potential victory. I enjoy victory.

So think about this. You want to avoid embarrassment? You're not going to succeed by avoiding negative emotions, a field which is much MUCH vaster than embarrassment. But I can guarantee you WILL succeed, eventually, if you dive into that field and your emotional profile will change, maybe even to including murderous. Transforming your mind and your actions until you feel only the emotions you want is a long and involved and exacting process, but there is no substitute. Dumb and mindless avoidance of all negative emotions merely ensures you remain a pathetic wretch who never gets what he wants in life.

I wanted to be able to dish out violence online and make enemies while never feeling humiliation caused by anyone else's or my own actions, and I succeeded totally. So I do believe your own much more pathetic emotional goals are entirely achievable so long as you know the math behind it and follow it scrupulously.

Friday, April 24, 2015

Who Needs Brain Bleach and Dreads Puppy Dog Eyes?

There is a particular type of person who keeps saying "OMG, TMI, I need brain bleach" at something innocuous like seeing old people fucking, or their parents fucking. Or even more innocuous, seeing their siblings fucking. Why the fuck would they do that? It's not like they have to do anything about it.

But the thing is, these people want to do absolutely nothing, not even think, so the mere learning of highly unexpected information is deeply traumatic because it requires them to think, to learn and to assimilate that information. And thinking, learning and assimilating are doing things, thus are highly negative to them.

Basically, these people are saying the equivalent of "OMG, I have to lift a finger! I don't know how to lift my finger! Freakout freakout freakout!" Which is utterly pathetic, and yes they are that utterly pathetic because their minds are fragmented and autistic. That's why thinking and learning are onerous chores to them which they will do the least possible.

These people still want to move to prove they exist, they just don't want to go anywhere so they twirl in circles going nowhere. They want to sleep because they don't want to die, and at least being asleep proves they exist. Dreaming proves they exist. They want to be, but not to do. They want to be Smaug the sleeping dragon sitting on his hoard, feared and left alone. And doing nothing.

Every time they have to move their paw to scratch themselves in a place they've never scratched themselves before, they have to remember how to scratch oneself and cobble this together with the new spot that is scratchy and see if that works. This is effort, but not half as much effort as having to learn something out of nothing, like learning to use a backscratcher when you've never scratched yourself before. OMG the trauma!

Why do these people dread "the puppy dog eyes" or "the stare"? And I don't quote dread because yes they do dread it. Well, it should be obvious by now, they want to do absolutely nothing, and someone personally connected to them asking them to do something forces them to do something ... which is not nothing and hence is to be feared and dreaded. "Oh no, I have to lift my finger, the horror, the horror!!!"

Other things they say are "I could eat". As opposed to "I want to eat" which requires having desires and so takes effort. As opposed to "I am hungry" which requires determining the actual state of their body, which takes effort. Yes, minimal effort, the kind of effort which virtually everyone scoffs at and says "that's no effort at all" and laughs in derision. But that's still effort to people who want to do ABSOLUTELY NO EFFORT.

Speaking of that, speaking in a thunderous voice, or getting angry, or caring, or even raising your voice, that all takes effort. Which is why these people are always soft-spoken, because that requires no effort. Which is why they always get along, because that requires no effort. Which is why they're always polite, because that's expected of them and takes no effort. In a lot of ways, these people are my antithesis, which is why I loathe them.

Another thing they say is "I see how it is" when they feel put upon. Why? Because that's the minimum possible reaction to an insult. Why, it's virtually no reaction at all. It's a mere placeholder for a reaction. It says "I should feel insulted but I won't go to the bother of it because then I'd have to do something about it". Except "I see how it is" is 5 syllables instead of 27. The only possible way to expend LESS effort would be to ignore insults entirely and be completely imperturbable. Which some of them actually do.

These people's minds are autistic and fragmented, with jagged bits and pieces grinding against each other painfully. That's why they don't like to think. It's also why they're all shy and awkward about virtually anything. It's also why they worship grace (least effort under adverse circumstances) because they consider virtually everything an adverse circumstance.

And it's also why they worship ecosystems since ecosystems are made up of animals that constantly grind against each other, whether to fuck or to kill. Ecosystems resemble their minds and Man always did create God in His own image. That's why these retards talk about loathsome "ecosystems of ideas". And it's also why they worship evolution which is just going along with random meaningless arbitrary forces their autistic minds can't hope to ever understand.

And it's also why they keep saying exterminating mosquitoes "will have repercussions we cannot hope to understand". Because they are autistic retards so of course they can't understand anything, and frankly don't want to ... because that requires effort. But you know what? Exterminating mosquitoes requires effort too, which is the actual reason they don't want to do it. And of course, they are terrified that those "repercussions we cannot hope to understand" might require effort.

To them, everything should remain exactly as it is. And if you're hurt by it, you should be soothed, because that's the minimum amount of effort. Slavery, war, disease, murder, infanticide, poverty, death, none of it matters and none of it could possibly matter enough to ... expend effort. Just ... compensate. Everything is in a beautiful "balance" which should remain exactly how it is indefinitely. Balance, the point of least effort to everything else.

And when that "beautiful balance" gets upset then it requires ... token effort to redress it. The people waving around placards and street signs saying "white people like me don't get shot by the cops" are basically whining "stop making me feel guilty for my white privilege". You'll notice that not one single word on the placard signs refers to the people supposedly being protested over, only to the protestors. But that's alright, waving that placard around got rid of their guilt so problem solved! Black people still getting shot? That's no longer their problem, they expended the effort to get rid of the guilt after all.

It's good to be privileged. Even after people make you feel guilty over it, you only need to put in token effort to fix it. On balance, it's a win-win-win. You win, your friends win and your buddies win. Corruption? Nah, *friends*. Because strangers don't matter and what kind of asshole would make you go to the ludicrously insane amounts of effort that caring for strangers would require? The notion of caring for strangers you don't personally see, talk to, or interact with in any way isn't even comprehensible to them.

To them, it's never "everyone should be free" or "everyone should be treated well". It's always "me and my buddies should be free and treated well". That word "corruption" is only bad because others think it's bad, and might ... require effort to deal with them.

It's always easiest (least effort) to deal with others when nobody knows what you're doing in the dark. So smile smile smile at everyone during the daytime and hide what others would disapprove of at night. Because it's only considerate to others to not tell them the things that would make them *go to the effort* of becoming upset, and would in turn make you *go to the effort* of dealing with their emotional reactions.

Also, everyone has the same basic drives (ie, wanting everything to be effortless) that they themselves do, because processing how alien minds work would require effort. In fact, just the notion that others' minds are alien to you requires effort to assimilate, so is basically anathema to them. And if for some reason they need to recognize the existence of other personality types, they will only recognize the minimal number of them for their particular goals. Naturally enough since that is least effort.

Ah yes, another giveaway word they use is "monsters". Not psychopath or narcissist or nazi, but "monster". What is a monster? "Someone or something whose body or mind I don't recognize and can't process with my autistic mind or otherwise makes my life difficult." An unexpected freak.

Thursday, April 23, 2015

The Paradox of Getting Along

Some people are confused about why it's wrong to lie. "Does this dress make me look fat?" White lies, polite lies. What's wrong with sparing people's feelings? What's wrong with getting along? What's wrong with being nice and kind?

Well, the problem with it is that if you ever lie, and especially if you ever lie casually then you become known as a liar and fundamentally dishonest, and at that point people will never trust you. And there's just no point getting along with people who are untrustworthy so nobody will bother getting along with you.

This is the paradox of getting along. If you try your hardest to get along with others, nobody will ever get along with you and you will fail in your endeavor. You will fail abysmally, wholly, and completely. If you care only about making friends with others, you will never have friends. And if you're lucky, people will snicker to your face rather than wasting your time.

Now, there is a good explanation for this paradox and it's this. People who care only about having friends or getting along or survival or whatever, they basically don't care about anything. Yes, they care about having friends, but others care about having friends PLUS they care about their projects, their goals, their dreams and their principles.

Nearly everyone cares about something more than getting along, and is perfectly willing to sacrifice getting along for what they care for. So how are they going to perceive someone who cares ONLY about getting along? Those people are going to fall into the Uncanny Valley and will subconsciously register as hollow, fake, and un-people.

Real people care about things and people who care only about getting along aren't real people. You can never trust someone who seeks only to get along with others because you can never predict what they will do. They are in fact a mere object thrown about by the whims of others, not an independent entity possessed of free will, not a person.

It's difficult for most people to understand others who are fundamentally unlike themselves. And what isn't understood can never be trusted, unless your entire personality revolves around faith and even then, faith is given to some people in preference to others. People who care about faith above all else will never place their faith in people who care about nothing.

And caring, genuine caring, can never be faked using hobbies or pastimes. Accumulating a steady succession of hobbies only shows to others that you just don't care about any of them. There's no way for people who care only about getting along to fake genuine caring or to fake out others about the fact that they don't care.

In a world of people who care about goals and dreams, those who care only about getting along and fitting in with others will never fit in and never get along. Why else is there an obsession with being "cool"? With literally not giving a fuck what others think? It's a reaction against "friendlies". Even if the "friendlies" have tried to corrupt "cool" to mean "popular".

If you care only about getting along with others, that is all you will ever have in life. You will never have comrades, you will never have brothers, you won't even ever have friends. And you might not even succeed in "getting along", that is, avoiding conflict at any cost.

Saturday, April 18, 2015

You Are What You Eat

Eat fat, be fat, right?

Eat meat exclusively and you're a mighty predator RAWR like the lion who claims all four parts of the kill. One part because he's king, one part because he's noble, one part because he's a team-member, and the last part he'll kill anyone who touches it.

Drink milk and be a cow, led hither and yon to pasture. It doesn't even taste good, it's not all that healthy with the growth hormones in it, so why are you doing it? I suppose it's the regression to infancy most desired by right-wing authoritarians.

Be a vegetarian and you're a plant. That just sits there and does nothing, merely "being" and "aware" of its environment. "Environmentally-aware", get it? Fucking plants, no wonder they feel so much sympathy for trees. Ought to take a chainsaw to them.

Eat honey and you're a worker bee, busily buzzing around for the benefit of the worker hive. All for the collective! Save the pupae!!

Eat fish and you're ... a bigger fish. Swimming in the currents of the great material continuum together with your school of identical other fishies while clinging to the belief that you're a precious unique individual. Ironically and ambivalently since there's no sense of direction out in the ocean.

Be an omnivore and ... you know, I don't know what the fuck you are but you might be like me. Maybe you're a monkey, clever little monkey, hihihi. Laughing at all the other stupid animals while chucking the "bend with the wind" trees into the fire. The trees that whine because they "never did anyone any harm".

Pacifism has saved: 0 people from slavery and/or a bullet to the head.