Tuesday, September 01, 2015

Mathematical pluralism
  • gregory chaitin's work
  •  goedel's incompleteness theorem, interpreted in a non-retarded way
  • the theorem in computability which says that for any string of kolmogorov complexity greater than K and any program which outputs that string it is mathematically impossible to prove there isn't a smaller program which outputs the string
  • routine multiple axiomatizations of the same theories
  • meta-mathematics and routine working with different theories (aka mathematical universes)
  • the result in mathematics where a finite theory seems to contain infinite elements as seen from inside of the theory, those elements being finite from outside of it - an interesting special case of Goedel which blatantly violates singularity
  • logical duality of T and F if you swap operations
  • morphisms in general

Mathematicians self-consciously play pretend that there is a single mathematical universe, but they ALL know it isn't true, without exception. Any that don't would be considered retarded. This has been so since the destruction of Russel's Principia Mathematica project by Goedel in the 1930s. The notion of mathematical unity or holism has been destroyed for all time and any mathematician who does not acknowledge it is a hackneyed bucktoothed hick.

Pluralism won conclusively, decisively and totally. Yet there still remains "debate" in mathematical circles because retards still do mathematics and insist on projecting their values on mathematical reality. Those values are not in fact holism but rather solipsism.



Physical pluralism
  • many worlds
  • opposed only by pilot wave theory
  • the fact "Copenhagen" is still bandied about as a word instead of an epithet and derided as utterly moronic should give you the idea that retards are winning
  • chaotic eternal inflation theory which is the only credible inflation theory (but again opposed by retards projecting their anti-chaos and "there's no such thing as a free lunch" values)
  • the fact the creation myth Big Bang Theory is not derided or used as an epithet despite its mathematical impossibility, statistical impossibility, and the acknowledged facts that 1. inflation must be true, 2. inflation erased any traces of a putative big bang, thus making it a myth or article of faith  <-- am="" and="" anti-reality="" are="" forces="" how="" i="" li="" of="" retarded="" showing="" singularity="" solipsism="" the="" you="">
  • cosmological horizons
  • cosmological domain walls, if they exist, and they probably do
  • event horizons
  • superstring theory's solution to event horizons
  • general relativity
  • the Mach principle
  • the Holographic principle
  • perturbative vs non-perturbative theories can be seen as dualistic vs monistic
  • superstring theory dualities, mathematical inequivalence yet physical equivalence. IOW, there is no possible way to tell what the fundamental objects of the theory even ARE. Is it a black hole or a fundamental particle? The answer is "who cares?" because you can provably never ever ever tell.
  • the fact superstring theory was only invented to clean up the shit that are point particles which is by every measure much, much worse
  • multiple realizability in general
  • the fact many worlds is pretty much accepted as standard among cosmologists, physicists who out of their own initiative care about the WHOLE universe rather than just their own selfish part of it


The fact subjective experience is just the internal states of a complex system perceiving its surroundings.

The fact mathematics + time = computability.

The fact mathematics is bigger than infinite and contains within it computability which contains within it theorems. And some of those theorems have state. And some of those theorems are sufficiently complex and maintain their own order against entropy through time and consume computation to do so, thus are alive. And some of those theorems have temporal relations to their surroundings, commonly called 'subjective experiences'. And some of those theorems possess living representation, aka intelligence. And some of those living intelligent theorems perceive the universe of mathematics they are in from inside that universe, and go to cocktail parties and publish philosophy papers and ask themselves "what is math?" and "what is physical reality?". When physical reality is just the subjective experience of complex mathematical theorems of their mathematical environment.

This is all just a chain of facts which starts with "what is subjective experience" and ends with ... there are people inside other branches of math and THEY think they exist and many of THEM are scumbag solipsists that think THEIR branch of math is super-special and thus OURS doesn't exist.

Singularity is solipsism.

And subjectivity or relativity is just an artifact of closed systems. As soon as you can define a boundary to a system, there are boundary effects and those are just two of them. Subjectivity is what crosses the boundary, and relativity is the fact that what lies beyond the boundary looks different depending on the closed system you start from.

In order to deny pluralism you would have to deny boundaries exist. In order to do that you would have to say you can never take any perspective with a boundary. And the only such perspective is the block universe. Pluralism you see is just ... multiple perspectives.



And as for determinism? Both many-worlds and pilot wave theory ARE deterministic. But many-worlds is not holistic. And as you saw, pluralism wins anyways so you win nothing by trying to hang on to a last vestige of holism. Also, I'm not even sure if there is any way to distinguish between pilot wave theory and many-worlds, and if there isn't then pluralism wins yet again.

Saturday, August 15, 2015

Consumerism: the Very Least Possible

Consumerism is based on two principles:
  • doing the least possible (ideally, absolutely nothing)
  • mutual exchange of value (in goods or favors)

Doing the fucking job you've been hired for is NOT the very least possible. The least possible is goldbricking, therefore you need a mutual exchange of value (called a bribe or reward program) in order to motivate people. And properly demotivate anyone who isn't corrupt so that they become exactly like the ones who are corrupt thus validating their personality type including values and worldview.

Now, you might think that treating people with respect, dignity, or like human beings is the least possible. (Shyeah!) This would be because YOU aren't positively and actively motivated by doing the least possible and have trouble comprehending the concept that anybody would or could be.

No, the least possible is caring for your progeny, the people who are necessary for your personal survival (called your tribe as in tribalism) and the clients that entertain you their patron. Thus are hereditary caste systems created ... out of the VERY LEAST possible. Ever wonder why India has a hereditary caste system AND rampant bribery and corruption? Now you can wonder how the combined abomination arose out of history rather than asking how two abominations coincide.

Ever wonder about the people who engage in token protest to ease their guilt by begging the masters to improve living conditions and don't actually give a damn about the results of their protest? Wonder no longer, they are doing the VERY least possible to ease their guilt over all the potential new clients and/or personal friends starving and dying in front of their eyes while retaining their own economic privileges.

Ever wonder about the people who preach pacifism while atrocities are happening in far away lands? That's right, closing their eyes to your death is the VERY least possible they can do, and they are committed to doing it! Very hardcore they are about sitting down (or "having a sit down") and not lifting a single finger to do anything. Ever wonder why pacifism is so prevalent an ideology in the USA in the context of its narcissistic love of war and torture? Wonder no longer!

Ever wonder at some people's belief in luck as a guiding principle in life? That's right, constructing coherent theories of how reality works and how you should run your life takes actual effort. Declaring that there are no such theories is the very least possible! It's even less effort than solipsism because under solipsism your wishes create reality which means you have to determine what your wishes are. Total randomness = luck = shit happens is so much less effort.

Ever wonder at the people who excuse slavery and talk up what a good master they have? Well, quite aside the fact that switching masters is a hell of a lot of effort, eradicating slavery is unimaginable effort. Excusing your master is indeed the very least possible!

Ever wonder if Uncle Toms are related to Peeping Toms? Well, peeping toms are doing the very least possible in order to engage another person in sex. Raping other people takes effort and securing their consent for sex ALSO takes effort, but peeping on them ... is least effort. Ever wonder why Japan is so consumerist, caste-based, tribalistic, cliqueist ... and always have "pervert" peeping toms in japanimes? You have been enlightened.

Do you know what final consumer means in biology? It means those who feed on the bodies of the dead. Because that takes least effort. Another word for fungus and mushroom is rot, also known as corruption. Huh, it looks like we've made a full circle, and making full circles is indeed the least possible way to dissipate energy since you come back to the exact place you left from so don't need to adapt to it in any way but already know what to expect.

You hated consumerism and now you hate consumerism. BUT ... you know why, and perhaps, just perhaps, you want them dead now. And that would be awesome because it WOULDN'T be the least possible. Consider that killing all those who want to do the very least possible would AUTOMATICALLY raise standards. And if you're not okay with killing them, there's always enslaving them. They LOVE slavery, it makes them HAPPY to have someone else think for them, and happiness is the ... very least possible.

Monday, July 06, 2015

You Means I

What could identity = equality = I = ego = self possibly mean in the context of group identity? Well, it means that You = I. For most people, the word "you" means I. And it's actually possible to hear that meaning when they use it. And no, I'm not talking about narcissists, that would be too fucking obvious.

It's noticeable when these people ask "where do you rewind the video?" that the "you" is indefinite and really means "I". Whereas I would say " Where the FUCK do you find the fucking rewind?" and there the "you" is definite and means "you the person that is not me".

Moralists lack any concept of mind or empathy or self-esteem or self-awareness. It's impossible to have self-esteem without a model of your own mind, and impossible to have a model without even a concept of it. And consciousness is not possessing a model of your own mind but merely attention of attention (attending to the fact you attend to things) or meta-attention.

Moralists believe the "mind" is the same identical thing as the brain. They are philosophical eliminationists, believing consciousness and the mind will be proven to not exist. At this, they are infinitely better than narcissists who believe that you are not your brain but rather are your face. If your face gets scarred then you have changed whereas if you brain gets lobotomized then you are still you.

Psychopaths don't even believe in the concept of brains unless they crack your skull open and poke in there and see them. And Right wing authoritarians believe the story that "you" are a brain is a mere convention which they will nod along to. Because the undead prove that brains can be eaten without affecting the person they are. Undeath will one day prove that you aren't brains.

So back to Moralists, they believe that all members of the group are equal and equally valuable, modulo leadership, and that you are judged by your actions. Since your actions are contingent on external pressure and social circumstances, your social circumstances dictate in large part what is you. Your brain merely implements an illusion of you as being different from other yous in the group which are all equally you.

Gaians believe the "mind" is a suspiciously empty container for memes, culture and biological urges. They believe that a person is their emotions, memories and other mindstate. When someone's mood changes they become a different person, when they acquire more memories, they become a different person, when they lose memories they become a different person. And if two people have the same emotions and memories then they are the same person.

So long as the addition and subtraction of memories can get from any person to any person (and Gaians believe memories define people) then "you" is exactly identical to "I" to Gaians. The only proviso is of course that different "I"s are at different stages of their life cycle. Some are more advanced and some are more retarded. Some are still being "taught to think" by their good master um parents, and others have already reproduced.

And it bears repeating, Gaians don't have any concept of mind. By "mind" they mean "the combination of the superego and the id" with no ego in between. Gaians believe that social pressure is a real thing and complain about how much it conflicts with their id. Now, you may be retarded enough to call this a "concept of mind" but that would make you the kind of retard that believes LEGO blocks are "construction material".

As proof that Gaians have no ego, I point to their naked and craven begging they engage in when they ask for favors. They say "it never hurts to ask" because they have no idea whether others will be inclined to agree or not, and because they have no ego to suffer shame or embarrassment. They talk about "the puppy dog eyes" because of course they beg for favors as cravenly as a dog begs its master for treats.

Incidentally, Gaian "self-esteem" is simply happiness since of course there is no concept of mind TO esteem and there is no ego to do the esteeming. And while I'm at it, I highly recommend Gaians as sex slaves since they love nothing better than servitude and being fucked. Unfortunately, they also love eating, sitting on their ass playing games, and see nothing wrong with getting fat, so you'll have to keep your sex slave on a diet.

Moving on, Freaks believe that "mind" is subjective awareness, and believe that "you" are your subjective experiences. They also believe that concepts and percepts "must be experienced" and cannot be communicated in any way, least of all language. That is why "you have to be here" for them to explain something trivial that they could have easily said on the phone. It is also why they become graphics designers obsessed with icons, audiovisuals and paralinguistics.

Freaks also believe that if two people share the same subjective experiences (eg, see the same thing because they are at the same physical location) then they are of "one mind" and possess a "common sense". Thus, by sitting close together, "you" becomes "I". And it is the reason why if they sense that you are unlike them in some way (eg, possess one of those mythical different personality types) then they will get gone after sexing you rather than cuddling.

To recap, Freaks are subjectivists and phenomenologists. And from those two facts it follows they are relativists since everyone can become anyone else by simple physical transposition. It's also the reason why Freaks are into movement, transportation, teleportation and unstoppability (as opposed to say invincibility). Because the more they move, the more they can experience, and amassing lots of different subjective experiences are the only thing that matters.

It's also why they're into shapeshifting, because by experiencing different things you become a different person since "you" is your experiences. Movement is just a degraded form of shapeshifting to them. It's also why they "move through life" when they age. As opposed to the Gaians who "advance" through their life cycle. Incidentally, Gaians also say they are "not that advanced" rather than "I'm not that smart" since "you equals I" means you can't be smarter than them.

Freaks also misuse "in your mind" to mean in your subjective awareness. Because again, they have no concept of mind, even less a model of it. Freaks can "just sense" when someone is different or the same as they are. In this same way, and by absolutely no coincidence, they can "just sense" true love rather than doomed love. Doomed love as would happen if the other person were "secretly" a psychopath, a narcissist or a yuppie.

Yet Freaks are very clear that personality types are mythical since "we are all different" and can't possibly be typed. Models of mind cannot be constructed and even if they could, they wouldn't be useful anyways. It is far better to go with the ideology of phenomenology and to hide the nasty discrepancies to this retarded ideology which your subconscious keeps throwing up.

Discrepancies such as the existence of Nazis, the Cold War, World War 2, World War 1, the 30 Years War, the Hundred Years War, ... you know, pretty much all of history. But then, Freaks aren't fans of history. Nor are they fans of anthropology except of course that it is marginal and so should be embraced the same way that goth hip hop should be embraced, and walking in the night being a vampire. It is bizarre, it is strange, therefore it is Freak. even if Freaks never actually go into that field.

Friday, July 03, 2015

Character Rape

So, I'm reading this author I despise, for lots of different reasons. Not least that it's from him I learned that Gaians have exactly four responses to other people.
  1. befriending them
  2. fucking them
  3. trading with them
  4. murdering them.
It's even a life cycle. You start by making friends then you end it by murdering them.

But just because I'm ready to despise his stupid plot lines doesn't stop some of his stories from going beyond the pale. And that's where character rape comes in.

"I think volunteering to heal critically injured people is noble and all that but there are plenty of things you could do with your powers that would rake in the cash.”

Gaian character by Gaian author, dismissing saving lives of random strangers as "and all that" and explicitly "not necessary".

"I was too focused on being a hero.”

The Gaian author rapes the Moralist character into saying this, which sounds as credible as making a psychopath say "you're right and I was wrong, I'll give up killing in favor of friendship".

Also, the Gaian attitude towards heroing is that it's a lark and needs to be augmented with jokes and comedy and parody and other ridiculous crap to make it fun.

Or ... money. Money makes the world go round, cause ... circle. Worship the circle!

“I hadn’t even thought of that. I guess being a hero is more complicated than I thought,”

This is the character that canonically thinks through EVERYTHING. But Gaian money-making schemes are always more important than saving lives thus not thinking about them is a sin. Whereas canonically the character would be more likely to frown and say "people are dying while you clown around" since you know, they fucking are!

'He would have rather not remembered the time he’d turned a hot girl down for a date because he’d had to tinker in the lab, especially since he’d been so distracted that he hadn’t actually gotten any work done anyways.'

Gaian makes a sexless RWA asshole think this, because to a Gaian, sex is obviously more important than a career. That and memory is fungible, only happy memories deserve to be remembered.

So, who rapes characters the least? Well, it's certainly not those who believe in cutting corners or that the ends justify the means. Or that cartoons contain full-fledged characters.

Wednesday, July 01, 2015

Cannibalism of Eggs and Ham

The traditional English breakfast is sausage and eggs. The traditional American breakfast is bacon and eggs. The traditional X breakfast is ham and eggs. What do those things have in common?

Cannibalism. Pig is the only meat animal that's an omnivore and ... tastes like human. And eggs ... are fetuses. Often, cooked eggs are far too normal so the wannabe cannibal eats raw eggs like bodybuilders. It does a body good to eat fetuses.

Now, I'm not saying eggs and pig aren't tasty. I'm just saying that somebody with a fetish for them to the point of eating them raw or doing other bizarre things with them is clearly doing so for non-taste reasons. Such as, eggs and pig remind Narcissists that everything in life is at the expense of others.

So, why's cannibalism traditional? Because Right Wing Authoritarians are downright neighborly with Narcissists. And I use "neighborly" advisedly to mean "someone falling into the Uncanny Valley of likeness to myself thus needs to be shot".

So obviously, Right Wing Authoritarians will kill Narcissists for being cannibalistic savages that eat fetuses and human meat ... and then partake of it themselves. I mean, it just makes sense!

Well, it does to me but then I downright expect hypocrisy from people who are fucked in the head.

Monday, June 29, 2015

The More Sordid Secrets Of Gaians

Because Gaians don't have souls and have to eat others' in order to possess what you mistakenly confuse for a personality, they're the only personality type that hybridizes with other personality types.

This results in Gaian affiliations. What everyone else would call a type but Gaians don't believe in personality types.

Psychopath Gaian - believes that everyone should die, but also believes in personal survival above all else and won't go to any effort to make it happen.

Additionally, since everything must be done for a reason because nothing intrinsically matters, there must be a reason for the apocalypse. Or, the Gaian apocalypse anyways.

Trees! Trees are wonderful and un-human like. If only all humans could die so we would have wonderful forests everywhere!

And animals! Animals that never harm anybody except to eat them alive. (Counter-example: leopards). Trees and animals! Nature!!

Obviously trees and animals are more worthy of living than human beings. The Psychopath Gaian is also known as the Druid. Or the Holy Gaia type.

Right-Wing Authoritarian Gaian - believes that where and how you personally grew up is how you should live and others who grew up a different way should stay in their own home.

The RWA Gaian is the "true Bronxer" who talks about the gritty realism of the Bronx and how the yuppie scum are invading and bringing their fakeness with them, and how they don't belong.

The difference between an RWA affiliated Gaian and an outright RWA is the lack of any fatalism and brutality. The RWA-Gaian is a milquetoast of an RWA. They basically tut tut the yuppie.

Freak-Gaian - speaking of Yuppies ... the yuppie is concerned with minimalism ... so long as it doesn't get in the way of their Gaian obsession with wealth and personal survival at any cost.

Now, Freaks like to get tattoos and be goths and go out at night and talk about how they're damned and go out into the primitive wilderness to be eaten by bears they hug.

But as far as yuppies are concerned, all of those things would threaten their corporate or personal survival. So ... nope, nope, nope, no way, nope.

Moralist Gaian - this is the shy awkward Gaian busily working at his job and shyly hoping for a shy girl just like him to have shy sordid sex with in the privacy of his bedroom.

Shy Gaian cares about nothing above social norms and where he stands in relation to them. He cares about being bland, boring and perfectly average. That way the carnivore will overlook him in the midst of the herd.

It's funny how un-bland Moralists are with their group survival and group identity. I mean, they go off to the jungles to convert the heathens and die as missionaries. They sacrifice themselves for the group in spectacular ways.

But well ... Gaian. Personal survival at any cost, so nope, nope, nope, nope, no way, nope.

Watcher-Gaian - likes to comment on how everything is a life cycle. The reason the yuppies displaced the true Bronxers is because it's a life cycle of urban development.

An urban area becomes poor and crime ridden so rents become low. With low rents, artists move in. With artists moving in, yuppies move in. With yuppies moving in, gentrification happens. With gentrification, rents skyrocket. With increasing rents and gentrification, artists move out. Then the area dies, starting the cycle all over again.

The Watcher-Gaian knows his place in the great Life Cycle of Urban Development.

Narcissist Gaian - or The Businessman cares about making tons and tons of business contacts. Business contacts that he will go to rotary club for and charity functions with and cultivate interests to be more like them so that those contacts like him.

This is the ... Uncle Tom of Gaians. By no coincidence since Narcissists love to mind control and enslave others and Uncle Tom is a brainwashed slave. Also, Narcissists love to actively corrupt, and Businessmen swim in corruption.


Sexually Sordid Secrets

Now remember, Gaians hate public exposure above everything else. That's due to their maxim "bend the rules, don't break them" which can't possibly be done in the light of day. And which is why I keep talking about them.

But of course there are exceptions to hating public exposure. There always are exceptions with Gaians. And the exception is ... sexual servitude. Gaians are natural born slaves thus natural born sex slaves. That's a hint hint for anyone in the market.

The four primary motivations for Gaians to have sex are:
  • sex as part of a life cycle (includes breeding and incest for the sake of sexual education)
  • sex for the sake of mindless animalism (includes orgasm and bestiality, go look at Corruption of Champions as a fantastic example)
  • sex for the sake of servitude (sex slavery)
  • sex for the sake of survival (includes corporate whoring)

To Gaians, it doesn't matter if you get raped up the ass by your boss ... so long as you get adequate monetary compensation. And it doesn't matter if you're publicly exposed, so long as it's at the whims of your master or mistress who has the wealth to buy um protect you. Wealth, not power, is key to corruption.

Hell, while I'm at it, I'll mention that Narcissists don't give a damn about money. They only care about how it can intimidate others and make them famous and popular. If the world weren't populated by Gaians who could be bought by money, Narcissists would just go into politics. Oh wait, they do go into politics. Well, they'd go more into politics.

Narcissists want slaves, not money. Serfs and toadies will do in a pinch. Fawning and adulation are fourth best. In a world of Gaians that whore themselves for money, you can buy slaves easily enough.

Wednesday, June 24, 2015

Valentine's Day: A Mockery Of Romance

First, what is romance? It's sexual and love idealism. It's not settling for second best, let alone 5th best, but going out for first best. It's not settling at all, ever, but going to extremes. Romance is Don Juan going through hundreds of women to find his match and feeling contempt for every one of them because they weren't. It's not Casanova being a "lover of women" and genuinely loving whatever woman he faced at the moment.

Romance is not the "intimacy of eating dinner". Romance is walking through a minefield. Romance is not something you do "when you feel romantic". It's something you always do because it's something you ARE. Romance is not your wedding anniversary or even your wedding, romance is all-consuming. Romance is not bringing flowers and chocolate or even any gifts. Romance is BEING a gift and constantly working to please your lover. Romance is not "put in its place" or "put in perspective".

To any genuine romantic, the Gaian approach to romance is utterly repulsive. Because to Gaians, everything is just a means to an end, the end being their own survival. Even romance is just a tool to be used, just another indirection, channel or connection. To be corrupted for the sake of their survival. Idealism are anathema to Gaians so why not sexual idealism? But of course, in their own terms, Gaians see it differently. They see it as perpetuating sacred Life Cycles.

So you start by meeting someone, through a friend of a friend, derivatively of course. And then you "experience romance" by going out to dinner. Even though eating is narcissistic thus anti-idealism, but hey, mysticism here. Plus, eating is necessary for biological survival and what could be more Gaian than being biologically correct? Or biology? Or survival? So already "romance" is corrupted all to hell.

But the nauseating bit is how romance is "put in its place". You have this mini-cycle of romance where you bring flowers and chocolate then go out to dinner and end by fucking. Fucking is the important bit to Gaians, just as much as surviving and breeding, not romance. And then the cycle ends with you both lazing back in afterglow blissed out of your mind, mindless and unthinking. And there the cycle ends only to be repeated all over again on another day. And that is "romance" to Gaians.

Of course, there is a larger sacred life cycle to Gaians which romance is a mere sub-part of, a mini-cycle as I said. It's the whole "relationship" life cycle. You meet someone, you go out on dates, then you have a honeymoon phase, then that can get extended by breeding and having kids. Or it's not extended and at that point you break up and start all over again. Because breeding is the important bit, if you don't do it then there is no point to the relationship and no point to romance. This is reflected in childless vs with-kids divorce statistics.

So Valentine's Day? Your wedding anniversary? Your wedding? The chocolates? The flowers? The gifts? Those are just fulfilling expectations, they're just ticking off the checkbox in a checklist named Romance or Relationship in a Gaian's mind. The purpose of the checklist is to fuck and to breed and to lay back in mindless orgasmic stupor. The actual things thrown together into the checklist don't matter and they have no intrinsic value. They are just tools to get the fucking and breeding accomplished

And of course this is exactly what "evolutionary theory" supposedly says. Which comes as no surprise given that evolutionary theory is a Gaian invention and something they worship. It's also wrong, both in the sense that evolutionary theory doesn't say that and evolutionary theory is factually wrong. But hey, what relation do Gaians have with the truth? It's easy enough to say "none whatsoever" but a tad oversimplistic. So, let's examine that tidbit in detail.

We saw that romance and relationships are both just a life cycle to Gaians. So too the scientific method and the truth are just a life cycle, an orderly circular progression of theories being born, growing up, breeding, then dying. And anything that violates the life cycle, such as a theory which is invented out of whole cloth and has no progenitors, like superstring theory? That's anathema and to be hated, and general relativity must survive within the objectively inferior quantum loop gravity.

Truth, ideals, science, academia, everything is just a life cycle to Gaians. EVERYTHING, without exception. Not one single fucking exception. Even FEELING is just a life cycle. "A time to laugh, a time to cry, a time to grieve, a time to go on a murderous rampage". There is not one thing they hold sacred except their own fucking skin, fucking, birthing, and reproduction.

Even love is just a part of a life cycle to Gaians. "It's time to let go." Just a tool supposedly used by evolution to ensure fucking and breeding happens.